Blue arrow second entry, stopped out by 2 ticks followed by as of now a 30 point rally. On the attachment is the context I saw at the time of the entry. I thought we were going to the overnight high at an absolute minimum, and a possible second leg up equal to the one we had at the time of entry. At the time it felt like a repeat of friday's spike and channel so I was pretty bullish.
I have many second entries noted like the one I took, first entry is congested and it breaks out and forms the second entry.
So on the whole, it is a trade that follows my plan, and I think I got the context right.
Clearly I was early because I got stopped out. I REALLY wanted to enter again on the engulfing bar after being stopped out but I just walked away for a while because I had a severe case of red-ass.
Signal bar was huge, didnt tick lower than the previous bear bar, and the whole setup did finish a bit high in the move.
Yeah its obvious AFTER the fact that I should have waited for 2 clear legs but many times this is a great setup. I was really suprised at the huge bear bar following the signal bar.
I dont want to let this effect my trading too much, I still like the trade, however the red-ass is still present after watching it rally for a while. The loss itself effected me negatively but I didnt see much after that to take.
Is there something I can take away from this or should I just chalk it up to "thats why we go for 4 ticks" like mack says. I was going for 1:1 as usual and I dont mind the loss if its a decent trade that just didnt make 1:1, I have accepted the added extra losses that will happen with the 1:1 strategy. Is there something I can learn from this other than I need to learn to not let a loss bother me?
Also the signal bar is huge, but im trying not to even think about the ATR anymore. It doesnt appear to matter as long as the bar is not huge compared to the average bars at the time. Everything ive seen as of now is that actually bigger bars mean more profit and filtering them down due to "size" is not something that needs to be done. Over time, over hundreds of trades it all averages out and increases profit. Obviously an unusually massive bar would be passed on, I just mean within reason.
- Screenshot 2024-01-08 122304.png (389.1 KiB) Viewed 3158 times
Blue arrow second entry, stopped out by 2 ticks followed by as of now a 30 point rally. On the attachment is the context I saw at the time of the entry. I thought we were going to the overnight high at an absolute minimum, and a possible second leg up equal to the one we had at the time of entry. At the time it felt like a repeat of friday's spike and channel so I was pretty bullish.
I have many second entries noted like the one I took, first entry is congested and it breaks out and forms the second entry.
So on the whole, it is a trade that follows my plan, and I think I got the context right.
Clearly I was early because I got stopped out. I REALLY wanted to enter again on the engulfing bar after being stopped out but I just walked away for a while because I had a severe case of red-ass.
Signal bar was huge, didnt tick lower than the previous bear bar, and the whole setup did finish a bit high in the move.
Yeah its obvious AFTER the fact that I should have waited for 2 clear legs but many times this is a great setup. I was really suprised at the huge bear bar following the signal bar.
I dont want to let this effect my trading too much, I still like the trade, however the red-ass is still present after watching it rally for a while. The loss itself effected me negatively but I didnt see much after that to take.
Is there something I can take away from this or should I just chalk it up to "thats why we go for 4 ticks" like mack says. I was going for 1:1 as usual and I dont mind the loss if its a decent trade that just didnt make 1:1, I have accepted the added extra losses that will happen with the 1:1 strategy. Is there something I can learn from this other than I need to learn to not let a loss bother me?
Also the signal bar is huge, but im trying not to even think about the ATR anymore. It doesnt appear to matter as long as the bar is not huge compared to the average bars at the time. Everything ive seen as of now is that actually bigger bars mean more profit and filtering them down due to "size" is not something that needs to be done. Over time, over hundreds of trades it all averages out and increases profit. Obviously an unusually massive bar would be passed on, I just mean within reason.
[attachment=0]Screenshot 2024-01-08 122304.png[/attachment]